Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:08:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/net htonl.S ntohl.S Message-ID: <20041021180809.GA36479@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200410201553.40823.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <4175B591.4090407@elischer.org> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0410192052490.13335-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <20041020190502.GA33840@dragon.nuxi.com> <200410201553.40823.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 03:53:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > We've hashed this out in the ancient past before and decided that we > would require a custom kernel for 80386 for 5.x but not a custom > userland. >From my memory that's not what we hashed out. We spoke of not supporting (ie, running on) 80386 by default. There was no explicit talk of just the kernel and not userland. Do you have mail logs showing otherwise? I'm guessing this will have to go to RE@ and Core@ to reconfirm the policy. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041021180809.GA36479>