Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:11:22 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: "Thomas E. Zander" <riggs@rrr.de> Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? Message-ID: <200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org> References: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> <20041029080817.GB728@empiric.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Friday, 29. October 2004 10:08, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:59:30AM +0200, Thomas E. Zander wrote: > > I'm just wondering why ehci doesn't make it into GENERIC for RELENG_5. > > Are there unresolved show stoppers related to it? > > ehci(4) is not stable code and fails reproducibly with my ALi-based > USB2 disk enclosure. Well, if we would take stability and general usefulness (even more so in comparison to other USB implementations in mind) as the reference point, we would need to disable most of USB. I think enabling ehci in GENERIC would be a good idea, especially since there's no loadable module... -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBgkF8Xhc68WspdLARAmfmAJ9wl84wonTv+b7B4LPx/btLAoRL4QCdEx/d SDWUevy6gM1vlR7bjAmZ1Aw= =yO+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock>