Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:53:20 +0100 From: Espen Tagestad <espent@totem.fix.no> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Palm or equalient supported by FreeBSD Message-ID: <20041104125320.GA16749@totem.fix.no> In-Reply-To: <20041104114156.GB43303@warning.this.domain.does.not-exist.de> References: <20041104110413.GA13307@totem.fix.no> <20041104112634.GA14296@laverenz.de> <20041104114156.GB43303@warning.this.domain.does.not-exist.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:41:56PM +0100, Hank Hampel wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> On (041104), Uwe Laverenz wrote:
> > > that support syncronizing with FreeBSD? I currently have a Palm Tungsten
> > > T, but I've given up trying to get it work under FreeBSD. I need
> > Our palms are connected via serial cable, not USB, is USB the reason
> > for your problems?
>
> Even USB connections shouldn't be a problem any more.
>
> I currently use a Zire21 with an USB cable to connect to my
> 4.10-stable system. I prefer using jpilot but this is merely advocacy.
>
> You just have to use the uvisor kernel module (kldload uvisor) which
> should automagically bring up the ucom module (if not just load this
> one too).
>
> I just checked the uvisor module and it seems to know something about
> Palms Tungsten T series as the following line suggests (taken from
> /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/uvisor.c line 220):
> {{ USB_VENDOR_PALM, USB_PRODUCT_PALM_TUNGSTEN_T }, PALM4 },
I know this, the uvisor and ucom devices are compiled into the kernel.
But still, as I pointed out on my last mail, I get the following
message:
ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2
ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2
ucom0: init failed, TIMEOUT
device_probe_and_attach: ucom0 attach returned 6
uhub0: port 1, set config at addr 2 failed
uhub0: device problem, disabling port 1
I have reported this to the bug-database too, you can read the message
here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2004-May/006731.html
Do you know when this was eventually fixed? I have a pretty updated
kernel, my uname -a reports:
FreeBSD lefse.aftenposten.no 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #1: Tue Nov
2 08:45:05 CET 2004 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LEFSE i386
regards,
Espen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041104125320.GA16749>