Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:03:20 +0100 From: Matthias Schuendehuette <msch@snafu.de> To: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: scottl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum remains broken in 5.3-RELEASE? Message-ID: <200411061803.21539.msch@snafu.de> In-Reply-To: <20041106152125.GC80167@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <200411061126.23666.msch@snafu.de> <20041106152125.GC80167@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Wilko, Am Samstag, 6. November 2004 16:21 schrieb Wilko Bulte: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 11:26:16AM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette > wrote.. > > I cannot imagine to deliver/sell CDs with 5.3-RELEASE on it with a > > broken gvinum RAID5 where the fix is available for (roughly) 2 > > weeks now. > > You obviously have NO idea what it means to build releases for > all the architectures etc etc. My apologies if I made you upset... I just cvsupped 5-STABLE this morning and noticed, that the old versions of the two gvinum-files mentioned are still there. And, No, I have no idea... I thought, release building starts after the release date... > Doing it once again just for this > stupid bug (we already delayed before, remember the RC2 ?) > is just not going to happen I would say. May be, that's not my decision. But I remember the release of 5.2.1 shortly after 5.2 and I just tried to help to avoid something like that for 5.3. Perhaps you're right - those people who play around with (g)vinum aren't beginners anymore and as such capable to cvsup to 5-STABLE anyway. But it remains kind of unlovely to ship already solved bugs... (IMHO) -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette <msch [at] snafu.de>, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at <pgp.mit.edu> and <wwwkeys.de.pgp.net> ID: 0xDDFB0A5F
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411061803.21539.msch>