Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:18:50 -0300
From:      Fernan Aguero <fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: fixes and comments on the upgrade script procedure
Message-ID:  <20041110011850.GB28553@iib.unsam.edu.ar>
In-Reply-To: <1100037439.17375.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
References:  <20041109204948.GA1732@iib.unsam.edu.ar> <1100037439.17375.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+----[ Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> (09.Nov.2004 18:56):
|
| On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 17:49 -0300, Fernan Aguero wrote:
| > Hi!
| > 
| > I'm running the upgrade script since yesterday ... I hoped
| > to have it finished by now,  but anyway ... since I had
| > some spare time, and lacking a better thing to
| > do I decided to read the upgrade script :) 
| > 
| > Attached is a diff with what I think should be corrected.
| 
| The comment diff is fine, but the other is not needed.  You must have
| downloaded an old version of the script.

Probably ... i downloded it the day you posted the message
on the availability of gnome 2.8.1 in ports.

| > Also, it seems that though not explicitly specified in the
| > script, the upgrade procedure tried to rebuild openoffice.
| > This together with mozilla and firefox helps explain the
| > long time it is taking. Apart from the time issue, what
| > happened is that the attempt to build OOo made the upgrade
| > fail when /usr filled up. I never build OOo from sources,
| > and always use packages. I just don't have the space to
| > build such a monster. Perhaps it may be possible to perform a
| > 'dry-run' of the script, just checking what would be done
| > and thus allow the user to exclude some beasts?
| 
| Patches are welcome.  However, you can also specify portupgrade flags to
| the script to attempt to upgrade from packages if available.
| 
| Joe
|
+----]

Yes, but these flags would affect all the ports, wouldn't
they? I've just listed openoffice-* in HOLD_PKGS based on
the suggestion by Adam W.

Sorry for the noise, then,

Fernan

-- 
Fernán Agüero | Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas
email         | fernan at { iib.unsam.edu.ar , mail.retina.ar }
wwww          | http://genoma.unsam.edu.ar/~fernan
phone, fax    | +54 11 { 4580-7255 ext 310, 4752-9639 }



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041110011850.GB28553>