Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:56:38 -0600 (CST) From: trorki@area51.capnet.state.tx.us To: Goran Gajic <ggajic@mail.sbb.co.yu> Cc: freebsd-amd64@www.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Too many mbufs Message-ID: <20041119124946.J29849@area51.capnet.state.tx.us> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.60.0411191757010.75856@mail.sbb.co.yu> References: <Pine.BSF.4.60.0411191757010.75856@mail.sbb.co.yu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Goran Gajic wrote: > Same with my dual amd64 4GB ram: > test# netstat -m > 18446744073709360129 mbufs in use > 8/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max) > 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) > 18014398509434128 KBytes allocated to network > 0 requests for sfbufs denied > 0 requests for sfbufs delayed > 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile > 91 calls to protocol drain routines Would you people please include at least a `uname -a` with these posts, even better state the motherboard you're running with. I am NOT seeing this with a Tyan s2882, dual 244, with 4GB memory, on 5.3-R #0. I get the expected results: 65 mbufs in use 64/25600 mbuf clusters in use blah, blah, blah stu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041119124946.J29849>