Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:13:16 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: David Syphers <dsyphers@u.washington.edu> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions Message-ID: <20041202231316.GA41896@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200412021201.50234.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> References: <200412021201.50234.dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:01:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote: > I just upgraded to 5-STABLE from an older version of 5, and wanted to rebuild > all my ports because of the ABI compatability breakage just before 5-RELEASE. > I ran across behavior in portupgrade that I don't understand - if I force an > upgrade because I already have the same version installed, portupgrade > refuses to use packages. e.g. > > ---> Found a package of 'net/cvsup-without-gui': cvsup-without-gui-16.1h.tbz > (cvsup-without-gui-16.1h) > ---> Located a package version 16.1h (cvsup-without-gui-16.1h.tbz) > ** Ignoring the package, which is the same version as is installed (16.1h) > ** No package available: net/cvsup-without-gui > > What on earth is wrong with portupgrade, and is there any way of convincing it > to use packages in this case? If I run 'portupgrade -rafP' it will merrily > upgrade via ports when forcing an upgrade, so why not packages? What command-line are you using? Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBr6GMWry0BWjoQKURAoFyAJwLY+Sf5K5glnzEEbTzXoBN0Ez8ywCgyJN9 kt9Dmy0mGlnUkhMK1eVt0iw= =RMs2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041202231316.GA41896>