Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:54:16 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: David Syphers <dsyphers@u.washington.edu> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions Message-ID: <20041203015416.GA75573@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200412021733.50294.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> References: <200412021201.50234.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> <20041202231316.GA41896@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412021723.52241.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> <200412021733.50294.dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:33:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote: > On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote: > > On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > What command-line are you using? > > > > Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u opt= ion > > to portupgrade, and I can understand why it can't do that without build= ing > > the port. Doing it without -u works fine. >=20 > Or not, actually. It has nothing to do with the -u option. It fails whene= ver=20 > it has to fetch the package (which it does successfully). The next time i= t's=20 > run, when it has the package already, it succeeds. That can't be a featur= e,=20 > can it? Again, show us, don't tell us. Kris --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBr8dIWry0BWjoQKURAvk4AKDZwfJTow+HoZ+tEn7FHHRCDphSUACfcCg7 gfoUGQ21wZBhTOOdjn9UHlM= =wQ5g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041203015416.GA75573>