Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:47:37 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about pipes and ugen Message-ID: <20041206134736.GM42454@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20041206123618.GJ999@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> References: <41B0DD18.9080300@elischer.org> <20041203.144432.89673091.imp@bsdimp.com> <41B0E3E0.4030207@elischer.org> <20041203.151630.29463265.imp@bsdimp.com> <41B0E927.5020904@elischer.org> <20041206123618.GJ999@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:06:19PM +1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > > > 0n Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:31:03PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > >I'm having a hard time understanding when this is needed and not > > >actually done by our -current stack. > > > > > Well, I'll check again because I'm runnig 4-stable at the USB sniffer.. > > I have however confirmed that the > > same behaviour is seen on a 6-current machine but I didn't have the > > sniffer on that (too far away). > > I'll go check that it actually looks the same on the wire.. (requires > > hauling the sniffer machine..) > > Okay I'm getting curious now about this usb sniffer. Where is it ? I > couldn't find one in ports ? He is likely talking about hardware. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041206134736.GM42454>