Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:55:05 +0000
From:      Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Adding standalone RSA code 
Message-ID:  <200412101755.iBAHt55A090986@grovel.grondar.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:57:42 PST." <41B9D586.5070403@wadham.ox.ac.uk> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Colin Percival writes:
>  > Is size really a concern?
> 
> No.  The size is a side-effect of having a minimal, highly secure,
> library, and was not a design consideration.

"New" very often means "Insecure". I'd rather see something with lots 
of eyes over it, and OpenSSL has the advantage of having quite a few 
competent crypto guys grovel through it.

I'm still inclined to say "Please stick with OpenSSL; it is the devil 
we know."

M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200412101755.iBAHt55A090986>