Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:32:53 +0000
From:      Dick Davies <rasputnik@hellooperator.net>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: bash - superuser
Message-ID:  <20041220133252.GB7774@lb.tenfour>
In-Reply-To: <20041220120620.GA68520@duplo.dahoam>
References:  <41C6AC75.6020608@uol.com.br> <20041220120620.GA68520@duplo.dahoam>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Gerhard Meier <gemei2@web.de> [1207 12:07]:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 08:41:57AM -0200, Giuliano Cardozo Medalha wrote:
> > I have a machine with FreeBSD 5.3 - release -p2.
> > 
> > I have installed bash from ports.
> > 
> > How is possible to use bash in root account ?
> 
> Do not change the shell of the root account. If you have /usr or
> /usr/local on a separate partition, and you cannot mount for some
> reason, you wont be able to fix that, without booting from
> another device.

No, but you'll still be able to use /bin/sh when going single user, so
what's the big deal? 

I really don't get what the problem is with this 'sh is on the root' argument.
Using bash is a lot more productive for many people, so why not let them use it?
If you're really terrified of not knowing how to use sh, then stick a static bash
in /bin. 

To the original poster: just be root and run 'chsh'.

-- 
'I should have been a plumber.'
		-- Albert Einstein
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041220133252.GB7774>