Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:42:29 +0100 From: Volker Stolz <stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/75155: [PATCH] audio/baudline: fetching does not require linprocfs Message-ID: <20041221154229.GQ23923@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <20041221161945.38a18658@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200412201235.iBKCZB0r063931@freefall.freebsd.org> <20041221161945.38a18658@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 21. Dec 2004 um 15:19 CET schrieb Ion-Mihai Tetcu: > > I used pre-install since I had to spend too much time > > thinking about why you'd go for pre-extract :) (including > > the roundtrip to pkg-message and then back to IGNORE) > > The idea was to not spend time extracting, patching, ... if no linprocfs > present and the user could see this form the beginning. If you look closely at the port, you'll notice that virtually no time at all is involved since it's a binary port. Actually the right thing to do would be having linprocfs as a run-dependency which is not possible. Now, we get almost all the regression testing for this port the cluster can provide, which unluckily because of the above restriction means stopping short of generating a package. I think we can all live with the new situation. Volker -- http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ *** PGP *** S/MIME
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041221154229.GQ23923>