Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:31:59 -0600 (CST) From: Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.waar.labs.mot.com> To: gerald@pfeifer.com Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix -pthread issue on lang/gcc3[34] Message-ID: <200501122031.j0CKVxjP084836@latour.waar.labs.mot.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0501092352441.75733@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> (message from Gerald Pfeifer on Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:58:08 %2B0100 (CET)) References: <200501081657.j08GvnML053109@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <Pine.BSF.4.61.0501092352441.75733@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.BSF.4.61.0501092352441.75733@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, Gerald Pfeifer<gerald@pfeifer.com> writes: [...] > David, Loren, how shall we proceed? I believe David raised issues wrt. > cross-compilation which would render the #ifdefs unsuitable for upstream. > Would a configure option, which is then used by the FreeBSD ports, be an > option? >> Index: gcc33/Makefile >> Index: gcc34/Makefile [...] David already patched both mainline and 3.4 branch on FSF. Thus, I think it is OK to have an equivalent port patch at least until you start to use an FSF release with the patch. I didn't check closely to see if this proposed port patch was exactly what David installed on the FSF tree. Regards, Loren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501122031.j0CKVxjP084836>