Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:40:02 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Siddharth Aggarwal <saggarwa@cs.utah.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD Message-ID: <20050112214002.GA21038@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.50L0.0501121412570.2985-100000@faith.cs.utah.edu> References: <Pine.GSO.4.50L0.0501121412570.2985-100000@faith.cs.utah.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:17:38PM -0700, Siddharth Aggarwal wrote: >=20 > I am responding to a post back in Oct 2003 when the checkpointing feature > was announced for DragonFly. I have been doing some research on this, and > have seen some projects that use Xen VMM to achieve checkpoints of guest > OSes. >=20 > So I was looking for inputs from people as to what everyone feels about > checkpointing, whether it should be done at the physical machine level or > VM level. Pros and Cons of each approach, if any further development was > done on DragonFly for checkpoint since then and if it was stopped, why? > Are there serious limitations to checkpointing a physical machine? >=20 > Sorry for such a vague posting, but I thought this would be a good > platform to get some feedback. The DragonFly lists would be the logical place to discuss DragonFly features. =46rom my perspective as a scientific computing user, VM level checkpointing is it little use since I get the overhead of the VM and I can't easily do the application level checkpointing required to checkpoing distributed programs. There are probably a number of places where it is useful in scientific computing, but I don't find it to be all that intresting. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB5ZkpXY6L6fI4GtQRAlG9AJwKKz6OGw5jC8VzAZ1165T2BTbFXQCZAemr F540VRaEwrmV84qWnDAHlsA= =vSbz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050112214002.GA21038>