Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:09:06 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Paul Allen <eng@donut.ugcs.caltech.edu> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-STABLE or -CURRENT? Message-ID: <20050114050906.GE29445@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050103231847.GJ22456@philemon.caltech.edu> References: <20050103231847.GJ22456@philemon.caltech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:18:47PM -0800, Paul Allen wrote: > I had experienced some issues with 5.3-Release vis-a-vis bad > bounce buffer panics. > > Am I correct in my read of the mailing list that 5.3-Stable > Resolves these issues? Yes. > Additionally, I was wondering if it was regarded as better > to run some snapshot of current. You should only run 6-CURRENT if you're really prepaired to deal with what -CURRENT is. > I've heard some off hand > remarks along the lines of "everyone who is running on amd64 > should be running -CURRENT." Is this true? No it is not true. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050114050906.GE29445>