Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:53:08 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Some initial postmark numbers from a dual-PIII+ATA, 4.x and 6.x Message-ID: <20050204225308.GJ163@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050203233735.24282F-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050203233735.24282F-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have the numbers below, but here are the conclusions: on this hardware, > using a single ATA disk, there was no real measurable performance > difference between UP/SMP, and 4.x/6.x -- 6.x came out slightly ahead on > t/s, but not hugely so. I take this to mean that the hardware was > basically I/O bound on file system meta-data operations. Thank you for your tests Robert. I don't want to consume your precious time needlessly, but I would like to compare these results with 5.x performances. There are already many improvements in CURRENT that will never be MFC'ed to RELENG_5 and this will show us if we can expect RELENG_5 to be someday as effective as RELENG_4 and CURRENT are. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen jeremie@le-hen.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050204225308.GJ163>