Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 02:21:40 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Jos? M. Fandi?o" <freebsd4@fadesa.es> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 50% of packets lost only on local interfaces Message-ID: <20050207102140.GA56842@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <42073FD8.5CCA7EC5@fadesa.es> References: <42073FD8.5CCA7EC5@fadesa.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote: > "Jos? M. Fandi?o" wrote: > >=20 > > Chris wrote: > > > > > > Have tested on 3 boxes. > >=20 > > yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't > > believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible. >=20 > Finally, I found the culprit: >=20 > CFLAGS=3D"" \ 100% of the transmited traffic is received > COPTFLAGS=3D"" /=20 >=20 > CFLAGS=3D -pipe \ 50% of the transmited traffic is received > COPTFLAGS=3D -pipe / That would be exceedingly strange, because the above two options are supposed to produce *no differences at all* with the code generation. I'd believe that -O and no -O could behave differently, although I don't know why you'd want to compile without -O. Kris --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCB0EzWry0BWjoQKURAvRwAKCrOZFPO5yl/I8jxI0FOHOFn/7TxgCgknfY fkxZGLXokZ/P/0jYvWTK87g= =JSVP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050207102140.GA56842>