Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:34:24 -0800 From: Joshua Tinnin <krinklyfig@spymac.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such asNetBSD!!! Message-ID: <200502111434.24639.krinklyfig@spymac.com> In-Reply-To: <27788582.20050211081120@wanadoo.fr> References: <200502092223.01650.algould@datawok.com> <420BFDCF.1000409@tvog.net> <27788582.20050211081120@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 10 February 2005 11:11 pm, Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > Frank J. Laszlo writes: > > Who says it has to be small? > > Business cards and letterheads say that. > > Logos are often reproduced at very small sizes, even on large > documents. They often appear in a corner or at the bottom of a page. > Logos are not used in place of cover art, but they often are a _part_ > of cover art. > > > Getting back to the point at hand, the beastie is nothing more than > > a mascot. plain and simple. But people are talking like there will > > be no more beastie representing FreeBSD. I dont think this is the > > point. > > What surprises me is that people care so much. It's the software > that's important, not the cartoon character that represents it. It > makes me wonder what sorts of priorities people have. I'd prefer > that people worry more about software quality, and less about pretty > pictures. You know, I haven't posted anything about this subject to this list itself - such discussions are probably better suited for -advocacy. In any case, I did some checking ... Hmmm, let's see, Anthony Atielski, 30 posts on this subject alone, on a tech help list. Makes you wonder what sort of priorities you have. Anyway, if you feel that way then let the thread die, or take it to -advocacy. - jt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502111434.24639.krinklyfig>