Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:02:14 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Dennis Koegel <amf@hobbit.neveragain.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pcre in base system Message-ID: <20050218080214.GQ82324@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20050218003534.GA31807@neveragain.de> References: <72c3a957050217031230598f63@mail.gmail.com> <86zmy3qmm2.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> <72c3a957050217065223729f83@mail.gmail.com> <20050217185422.GJ57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <20050218003534.GA31807@neveragain.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Replacing the standard behaviour with PCREs definitely is a bad idea. > > But, well, it would actually be nice if PCREs would be available as an > *option*. Analogue to grep, grep -E / sed, sed -E, ... one might have > grep -P (and not confuse it with pgrep ;-), sed -P and so on. Note that the pcre port is shipped with the pcregrep command. There is unfortunately no pcresed or pcreawk command. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen jeremie at le-hen dot org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050218080214.GQ82324>