Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:11:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ABI suggestions? Message-ID: <20050221051100.GA13873@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050220193909.K1739@odysseus.silby.com> References: <42192D78.6070600@elischer.org> <20050220193909.K1739@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 07:40:35PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: >=20 > On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Julian Elischer wrote: >=20 > >I'm looking at implementing a kernel module that implelemnts an ABI that= =20 > >allows a particular tcp session to be followed. > >I'm not terribly intereted in the data sent/received bas in the actual= =20 > >session > >behaviour itself.. >=20 > >p.s. would this be generally useful (assuming it can be achieve without > >any overhead when compiled out)? >=20 > Yes, I think that'd be very useful; when a user has a repeatable network= =20 > problem, we could have them turn this on and create a detailed log file= =20 > for us. In cases of reset connections, etc, this would be quite useful. Wouldn't it be best to use KTR for this on 5.x/6.x instead of introducing another KTR-alike? Kris --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCGW1kWry0BWjoQKURAledAJ4skneT61kQAIyXg5YZgeQGfr0VogCg0rmS fKggdcxxV1of8K9IyENuwtk= =0wlf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050221051100.GA13873>