Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:49:30 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/pcre and WITH_UTF8 Message-ID: <20050221174930.GA89403@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <200502210830.37208.ringworm01@gmail.com> References: <20050221142951.GA48781@pc5-179.lri.fr> <20050221155832.GJ51280@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050221161638.GA49381@pc5-179.lri.fr> <200502210830.37208.ringworm01@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Lun 21 f=E9v 05 =E0 17:30:36 +0100, Michael C. Shultz <ringworm01@gmail.= com> =E9crivait=A0: > > For the port I'm talking about, I can think of a way to test if pcre > > has UTF8 support, but not on how to force reinstall. >=20 > This seems like a good solution on its own. Just do the test you=20 > described, if it fails print a message that says pcre needs to be built= =20 > with WITH_UTF8=3Dyes or however that port sets its options. No need > to modify the ports system. It's OK to check if the required option has been enabled, but this is not sufficient: with this solution it would be impossible to package the port and you have to define IS_INTERACTIVE. A slave port would be fine. --=20 Th. Thomas. --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCGh8qc95pjMcUBaIRAiGdAJ9QBfY+HYYXFmNeMfcLcmEeZsp7rgCgzShe JYiSYooPkCF38cW8Y1CUk7g= =Zeq/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050221174930.GA89403>