Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:54:31 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Grooms <mgrooms@seton.org> Cc: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fwd: pf + pfsync + carp testing ... Message-ID: <20050301185431.GA81982@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <4224B078.9020301@seton.org> References: <200502282232.17646.max@love2party.net> <4223931C.9000607@seton.org> <200502282326.41760.max@love2party.net> <4224B078.9020301@seton.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 12:12:08PM -0600, Matthew Grooms wrote: M> Thanks Max and Gleb. You have been a great help. The patch applied M> cleanly and compiled fine. After configuring a few carp interfaces, they M> seem to fail over well. I am curious though, is CARP designed to have M> interfaces fail over individually or as a group? To make backup router preempt the master, when at least one interface fail you need to set sysctl net.inet.carp.preempt to one. This is also described in carp(4). -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050301185431.GA81982>