Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:54:54 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: gordon@FreeBSD.org Subject: cfengine vs. cfengine2 Message-ID: <20050311175454.GL48918@elendil.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tKy6e3LXpfmanBFM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (sysutils/cfengine and sysutils/cfengine2 port maintainers cc'd) Hello, I would like to get your feedback on idea of deprecating cfengine port=20 in favour of newer cfengine2 port. =20 After all, the former is at version 1.6.3, and the latest function change= =20 was this: ---------------------------- revision 1.24 date: 2002/07/29 20:47:37; author: gordon; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 Update cfengine MASTER_SITES Note this was almost 3 years ago. I think we could first add NO_LATEST_LINK to the cfengine port so users can pkg_add -r cfengine to get the latest version and then mark the port as DEPRECATED with some date - say 3 or 6 months in the future. Any thoughts, objections? Is cfengine 1.x still in use somewhere? Sergei --tKy6e3LXpfmanBFM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCMdtuFOxuaTulNAERAiMoAJ4+EuUwR8ggLMVY+5CbifvRCByVuwCeK6Gt tVLIIYw/+Uk2OEbxPMLG8Ao= =6ny2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKy6e3LXpfmanBFM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050311175454.GL48918>