Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:25:15 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> To: FreeBSD-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: libm Message-ID: <20050313191932.O74062@april.chuckr.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm still trying to build gnome-2.10 ... it's broken right now in building audio/arts. The current error is one that's becoming depressingly familiar: moc died, it's missing a "libm.so.2". In the past, for all these kind of errors, I would track down the executable that needed the old libm, but I am wondering, maybe it wouldn't be all that horrible a thing, to fake it out? Would it work for me, do you think, to have a softlink, from libc to libm? Woud it hurt anything? (As long as I didn't try to propagate anything that wanted to use libm!) Would it actually work, solve that dependency problem? Or am I actually, for some reason, really better served by tracking down the old software and relink it? That's a heck of a lot of extra work, you understand, right? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD, chuckr@chuckr.org | electronics, communications, and SF/Fantasy. New Year's Resolution: I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up fictitious words in the dictionary (on the wall at my old fraternity, Signa Phi Nothing). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050313191932.O74062>