Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:33:50 +0100 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blade 100 w/ 5.4-PRERELEASE console Message-ID: <20050313223350.J55534@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <20050313211440.GB1470@dragon.NUXI.org>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:14:40PM -0800 References: <20050312062214.GH10159@hex.databits.net> <20050312181935.A90975@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20050313211440.GB1470@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:14:40PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 06:19:35PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 12:22:14AM -0600, Will Andrews wrote: > > > mess with the OBP variables. I believe this is needless pain for > > > users trying to install FreeBSD on their Blade 100s (and possibly > > > other models). > > > > No, this is a nit which easily can be worked around. A real pain is > > that binutils are broken on sparc64 and users have to manually apply > > a patch to the base src and recompile binutils in order to be able > > to build a number of ports. > > Applying a patch that is running work around is a nit which can be easily > worked around. NOT being able to boot to apply a patch isn't. > I don't get what you try to say with the first sentence but the work-around to be able to boot was to set both input-device and output-device to ttya. I suggested you to do just this three times.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050313223350.J55534>