Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:31:33 -0500 From: Alec Berryman <alec@thened.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade (vs. Portmanager) question Message-ID: <20050328023133.GA46123@thened.net> In-Reply-To: <424769D0.5030500@att.net> References: <424769D0.5030500@att.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jay O'Brien on 2005-03-27 18:20:00 -0800: > Now, pkg_info says I have 10 packages installed; added were ezm3,=20 > gettext, gmake, libiconv, libtool, portupgrade,ruby and ruby18. If=20 > these all required to make portupgrade or perl work, where is that=20 > reference? They are required to build and run portupgrade. If you do a 'make search name=3Dportupgrade' from /usr/ports, it will list all the dependencies. =20 > PS.. I tried to install portmanager again, and this time it got the=20 > files immediately and installed fine. It took about a minute, not two=20 > hours. It reports that all my ports are up to date. Whew. That's because portupgrade did all the work :) If you had run portmanager before running portupgrade, you would have seen something similar - portmanager taking two hours and portupgrade taking almost no time at all. --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCR2yFAud/2YgchcQRAt3tAJ9VhoFWki3wYvqyDuE7epYf0ocGggCg5Poz CVq0wu6jBqMxjRxHCspA0zM= =LjjS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050328023133.GA46123>