Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:40:46 -0300 From: Alejandro Pulver <alejandro@varnet.biz> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dependencies not prompting for options Message-ID: <20050414164046.3e2ee562@ale.varnet.bsd> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff05041412272a1d8c61@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050414161418.057f29cd@ale.varnet.bsd> <790a9fff05041412272a1d8c61@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 14:27:09 -0500 Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/14/05, Alejandro Pulver <alejandro@varnet.biz> wrote: > > I am making a port that has a meta-port and 5 ports. The meta-port > > has an OPTIONS dialog to choose wich ports to install, and each of > > them also have options (for building). However, when I choose the > > ports from the meta-port, they use the default building options > > instead of prompting for them. > > > Did you build those port individually before you tried the meta-port? > > If you did, try a "make rmconfig" in each of those ports before using > the meta-port. > > Scot Hello, Thank you for your reply. No. It says (when falling into the dependencies): ===> Patching for pmars-sdl-0.9.2 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for pmars-sdl-0.9.2 ===> pmars-sdl-0.9.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/sdl11-config - found===> pmars-sdl-0.9.2 depends on shared library: SDL-1.1.7 - found ===> Configuring for pmars-sdl-0.9.2 ===> Building for pmars-sdl-0.9.2 There is no "Found saved configuration for ...". And it does not stop in "Configuring for ...". Best Regards, Ale
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050414164046.3e2ee562>