Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 09:46:27 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <yongari@rndsoft.co.kr> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em(4) patch Message-ID: <20050416004627.GA11603@michelle.rndsoft.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20050415154309.GS56487@funkthat.com> References: <20050414092608.GB2855@michelle.rndsoft.co.kr> <20050414192749.GO56487@funkthat.com> <20050415023902.GC7393@michelle.rndsoft.co.kr> <20050415030935.GQ56487@funkthat.com> <20050415042731.GD7393@michelle.rndsoft.co.kr> <20050415051112.GE7393@michelle.rndsoft.co.kr> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0504151208040.3463@tea.blinkenlights.nl> <20050415154309.GS56487@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 08:43:09AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Sten Spans wrote this message on Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:09 +0200: > > >With your changes JUMBO frames work here. This should also fix PR75794. > > >It would be really great if your changes could be comitted. > > > > Let's not forget ipv6 please, it needs this fix too, > > if the code is imported. > > And netatalk, netipsec and netipx too will probably need these changes.. > > Another reason I haven't brought in the code quite yet... > Hmm, this means we have to patch all filrewalls(pf/ipfw/ipf), carp(4) and possibily netgraph(4) too. I'm afraid this is not right direction to go. Alignment fixup would be best served in ether_input or in driver layer which seems to be more appropriate place. Maybe this is the reason why OpenBSD have such a complex alignment code in em driver. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~yongari | yongari@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050416004627.GA11603>