Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 18:09:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@corbulon.video-collage.com> To: scottl@samsco.org (Scott Long) Cc: msmith@mu.org Subject: Re: speed of a ciss-based pseudo-disk Message-ID: <200504172209.j3HM9Wbu097640@corbulon.video-collage.com> In-Reply-To: <4262B4A0.8080902@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Why is the reported speed only 135.168MB/s? All equipment is U320, > > so I'd expect the nominal speed of 320MB/s... > Just because a disk can communicate at Ultra320 doesn't mean that it > can sustain data at that rate. Yes, and the kernel would have no way of knowing the sustainable speed anyway. Which is all why I was inquiring about the _NOMINAL_ speed reported... -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504172209.j3HM9Wbu097640>