Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 23:46:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Foo Ji-Haw <jhfoo@nexlabs.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is 4.11 still a good idea? Message-ID: <20050509064637.GA83454@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <427EE0F2.3090709@nexlabs.com> References: <mailman.0.1115610319.58274.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <427EE0F2.3090709@nexlabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:02:58PM +0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote: > Hi guys, >=20 > I'm thinking of installing 4.11 on my next server, seeing that we have=20 > some Java issues on the 5.x series (I've been informed that native Java= =20 > on 5.x is not a good idea). Why not? > Can I get some feedback on whether development and/ or support on 4.11=20 > is still active and updated? I've spent quite some time on the 4.x=20 > series, so I am quite comfortable with it. It's certainly not very active. Some developers still have an interest in it, but most of the development and bug fixing activity goes into the 5.x and 6.x branches. Kris --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCfwdNWry0BWjoQKURApAFAJ9j8scXV7lYd5+p/ejXSacsuNeuoQCgnyo9 82kyJhiaDUP06WFsWH4FW2c= =rASP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050509064637.GA83454>