Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:12:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Shadwick <tshadwick@goinet.com> To: Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@clara.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portaudit is being stubborn Message-ID: <20050521111200.Q11826@mail.goinet.com> In-Reply-To: <20050521110951.GB27958@voi.aagh.net> References: <20050517144200.T26182@mail.goinet.com> <3aaaa3a05052005436414e0a3@mail.gmail.com> <20050521110951.GB27958@voi.aagh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'd like to see it done, but I know just enough sh scripting to be
dangerous. ;)
If it were perl I'd be all over it. Any takers? :)
On Sat, 21 May 2005, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Chris (chrcoluk@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> This annoys me as well, I expect portaudit to alert me when an update
>> is available to fix an exploit, but wget has no update so what is the
>> point of the warning, there also seems to be no way to shut it up.
>
> portaudit_fixed is only for OS bugs (i.e. associated with
> kern.osreldate). portaudit is just a shell script; if it bothers you
> that much, submit a patch to make it work for port problems too, or
> send-pr :)
>
> Looks like a case of moving the "if (fixedre && $2 ~ fixedre) next" line
> outside the "$1 ~ /^FreeBSD[<=>!]/ {" section around line 140, or
> something to that effect.
>
> --
> Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst
> http://hur.st/
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050521111200.Q11826>