Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:00:58 -0400 From: Parv <parv@pair.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, cy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/81440: Major improvements to x11-wm/fvwm2-devel port Message-ID: <20050525020058.GA966@holestein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <200505241511.j4OFBuMV073443@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200505241511.j4OFBuMV073443@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <200505241511.j4OFBuMV073443@freefall.freebsd.org>, wrote Alexey Dokuchaev thusly... > > Synopsis: Major improvements to x11-wm/fvwm2-devel port > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->cy > Responsible-Changed-By: danfe > Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 24 15:11:37 GMT 2005 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Over to maintainer. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=81440 General *ARGH! CARP!* for the port being OPTION-ified. More importantly, to the PR originator, why "WITHOUT_XINERAMA ... is of little use"? Perhaps not to you, but i do use it. - Parv --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050525020058.GA966>