Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:01:48 +0100 From: "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org> To: Jon Mercer <jon.mercer@achean.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 Message-ID: <20050602180147.GA790@anarion> In-Reply-To: <60053.217.33.199.34.1117734722.squirrel@webmail.achean.com> References: <429EF96E.16172.33600ABA@localhost> <20050602100934.Y20286@Osgiliath.home.lan> <60053.217.33.199.34.1117734722.squirrel@webmail.achean.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The same reviewer did a review of OpenBSD a couple of articles previously: > > http://os.newsforge.com/os/05/05/20/1426216.shtml?tid=8 > > On the whole his experience looked worse than with FreeBSD, but the tone > of the OBSD article was more favorable. Anyone else notice this? > > Jem Matzan just seems to be anti-FreeBSD. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Achean Ltd http://www.achean.com > Jon Mercer jon.mercer@achean.com Director > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Jem Matzan is known for poor reviews throughout *BSD. -- - Liam J. Foy liamfoy@sepulcrum.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050602180147.GA790>