Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 00:06:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen <svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net> To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> Cc: Gray Lilley <gray@mistaken-identity.co.uk>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: df -h output Message-ID: <20050608000105.C54577@maren.thelosingend.net> In-Reply-To: <15510122605.20050607230929@rulez.sk> References: <ACE436445E3CB14DB6B6DF23AB5D72DB0194CF@magnum.Home.local> <15510122605.20050607230929@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Daniel Gerzo [2005-06-07 23:09 +0200] > Actually, this question is asked 2-3 times a month (if not more) ;-) In fact, it is asked so often, that one might be inclined to make the output of df imply this is some way or another, by means for a "reserved" column or something like that. But it would probably violate the pola and/or some standard. Maybe the df manpage should mention this, incl. a reference to tunefs?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050608000105.C54577>