Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:56:48 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: device sio vs. device uart Message-ID: <200506101356.50355@harrymail>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Originally I posted this to questions@ but got no answer so I'd like to ask here: Hello, after compiling a custom kernel with device uart instead of device sio I see the following in my boot message: sio0 failed to probe at port 0x3f8 irq 4 on isa0 sio1 failed to probe at port 0x2f8 irq 3 on isa0 sio2: not probed (disabled) sio3: not probed (disabled) But I don't have sio in my kernel at all. Can someone please explain me the major differences (besides the newbus adaption) between sio and uart? And why is sio still in GENERIC? And of course why do I see these sio messages? Thanks in advance, -Harry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCqYACBylq0S4AzzwRAp5yAKCLQ0vB6X+00CMDosIBm7ITDnOahgCfQ16n be4M3haejRBemXSy7QyqFCk= =0l1W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506101356.50355>