Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 05:25:33 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer <julian@vicor.com> Subject: Re: aaaargghh.. sendmail again Message-ID: <20050706022533.GA3975@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20050706021053.GD69456@gir.gshapiro.net> References: <42CB29E4.8090203@vicor.com> <20050706015555.GA3301@gothmog.gr> <20050706020026.GC69456@gir.gshapiro.net> <20050706020734.GA3762@gothmog.gr> <20050706021053.GD69456@gir.gshapiro.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-07-05 19:10, Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@freebsd.org> wrote: > > That's funny. I can see root in the E class even in the standard freebsd.cf > > generated from the freebsd.mc file we have in src/etc/sendmail: > > Aha, DOMAIN(generic) has the EXPOSED_USER() call. That is what is > adding it in. Very true. Is that correct though, or should we remove it from the generic.m4 file of FreeBSD? It would be nice to have all the existing options of DOMAIN(generic), like confFORWARD_PATH or confMAX_HEADERS_LENGTH, without having to duplicate them in freebsd.mc (or the local equivalent) but without also exposing automatically usernames like 'root'.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050706022533.GA3975>