Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:42:32 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NIC suggestion Message-ID: <200507061142.36030.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <19069.199.181.134.212.1120667567.squirrel@mail.phantombsd.org> References: <19069.199.181.134.212.1120667567.squirrel@mail.phantombsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1202267.EKqPfc2hrI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 06 July 2005 11:32, Casey Scott wrote: > I am experiencing the same rebooting under network stress that others on > this list have reported. The box is using 3com 905b's, and I would like > to try another NIC in the box to make sure that this isn't just a driver > issue, though I strongly suspect it isn't. Can someone suggest a common > 100 MB NIC that has proven to be very stable in 5.x? Intel EtherExpress PROs (fxp driver) are pretty much universally respected. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1202267.EKqPfc2hrI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBCzAn75sRg+Y0CpvERAl12AKCkAhpzZxYBnf5Rk0/K1y7JNDgplwCeNKJA Fu5Y5b033xzQuMtExzfvSJw= =0fyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1202267.EKqPfc2hrI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507061142.36030.kirk>