Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:30:41 +0200
From:      Nicolas Rachinsky <fbsd-div-0@ml.turing-complete.org>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Another bug in IPFW@ ...?
Message-ID:  <20050803083040.GB89059@pc5.i.0x5.de>
In-Reply-To: <200508030825.j738PFg7008844@lurza.secnetix.de>
References:  <42EFBCDC.6090900@wm-access.no> <200508030825.j738PFg7008844@lurza.secnetix.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> [2005-08-03 10:25 +0200]:
> Sten Daniel Sørsdal <lists@wm-access.no> wrote:
>  > Oliver Fromme wrote:
>  > > However, the problem is that the second option is being
>  > > ignored, and I would like to know why, and how to work-
>  > > around the bug.
>  > 
>  > Would this work?:
>  > 
>  > # ipfw add pass ip from me to $N out xmit xl0
> 
> No.  It wouldn't check the (non-existing) incoming interface.
> The "from me" pattern does not check any interfaces.  It only
> checks that the source IP in the packet is one of the locally
> configured IP addresses.

ipfw add deny ip from me to any in 
ipfw add pass ip from me to $N out xmit xl0

But I would like the 'not recv any' feature, too. At the moment I use
a static list.

Nicolas



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050803083040.GB89059>