Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:12:36 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: differences in supported filesystems between FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <20050816141236.GA26422@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <4301E817.9030000@dial.pipex.com> References: <b7052e1e05081122446572c8b0@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050811225358.04fdf160@cobalt.antimatter.net> <4301E817.9030000@dial.pipex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Aug 16), Alex Zbyslaw said: > Glenn Dawson wrote: > >Even if there were, if the file systems you are using now are > >working, there isn't much reason to change them. > > > >UFS2 expanded some fields from 32 bits to 64, and added or changed a > >few features, but the two are still very similar. > > UFS2 also added snapshots which make live dumps safer, among other > things. Snapshots work just fine with UFS1. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050816141236.GA26422>