Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:34:27 +0200 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@freebsd.org> Cc: Satsuki FUJISHIMA <sf@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Needed: compat5x package Message-ID: <200508192334.28064.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <20050820.044946.21925501.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <20050820.044946.21925501.hrs@allbsd.org> <200508192250.46012.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20050820.060710.101601176.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 19 of August 2005 23:07, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> wrote > in <200508192250.46012.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>: > > de> One thing to consider is how to get these libraries. If they are taken > from de> 5.4 release tarballs then there is problem with locale above and > at least de> problem with libz and FreeBSD-SA-05:18.zlib vulnerability. O= ne > possible thing de> to do is to build RELENG_5_4 with the change to paths.h > above and take de> libraries from there and generate tarballs (which is > what I did for this de> sample except I took RELENG_5). If that makes sen= se > I can do it for alpha, de> amd64, i386 and sparc64. > > True. These libraries have to be built with vulnerability fixes. > I took them from 5.4-RELEASE as you pointed out. Building from > the RELENG_5_4 source looks reasonable to me. > > I am wondering if misc/localedata can be used---were the LC_* files > architecture dependent at that time? I thought this incompatibility > was needed to making them architecture independent. > Do I misunderstand? =46rom misc/localedata pkg-descr and comment it seems this is what should b= e=20 used. I took dependency from compat4x port. I will CC the maintainer, just = to=20 be sure... Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508192334.28064.dejan.lesjak>