Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:40:12 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: martin hudec <corwin@aeternal.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which mutt?? Message-ID: <20050910224012.GL84582@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20050910183932.GA81928@pleiades.aeternal.net> References: <43231860.6020902@purdue.edu> <20050910174139.GA39629@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20050910183932.GA81928@pleiades.aeternal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Sep 10), martin hudec said: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:41:39PM +0200 or thereabouts, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > mutt-devel > > > > This is a development version of mutt. Is newer and has more > > features than plain mail/mutt, but has possibly more bugs too. > > This one is good to use.. > > > > mutt-ng > > > > This is a branch of mutt, that tries to incorporate various patches > > that are floating around. What I wrote above about mail/mutt-devel > > applies here too, only more so. > > I have switched from mutt-devel to this baby.. it is pretty good, > and it offers few things I was missing in mutt-devel, like imap > headers caching etc. Just build mutt-devel with WITH_MUTT_IMAP_HEADER_CACHE=yes (it's been an option since 2003). Actually it'd be nice if those were converted to OPTIONS so people knew about them. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050910224012.GL84582>