Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:53:16 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: improving devel/m4 Message-ID: <200509131653.17218.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <6CA62C9C-7BC6-4B51-8C65-DB5381B68491@freebsd.org> References: <200509130558.j8D5w1Ha088160@blue.virtual-estates.net> <200509131508.02955.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <6CA62C9C-7BC6-4B51-8C65-DB5381B68491@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
в╕второк 13 вересень 2005 16:45 Ви написали: > [ade@foo:~] 6% grep m4-1.4.3 /usr/ports/INDEX.local |wc -l > 726 > > With 726 direct consumers of m4 within the ports tree, caution is > always a good thing. You skipped through my point, that the current ports will not make it to 6.0-RELEASE anyway. The ports tree was tagged back in August. And even if we decide to re-do the port-freeze/thaw, there will be full rebuilds on all platforms -- with 726 users pointyhat is sure to find trouble if there is one... > Given that the software authors believe it to be unacceptably > detrimental to performance, I'll tend to believe them, and leave it > as-is. Ok, makes sense. Yours, -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200509131653.17218.mi%2Bmx>