Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:29:48 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Wouter van Rooij <aentgood@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ELF binary type "0" not known. Message-ID: <200509162329.49465.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050916135614.GF2813@straylight.m.ringlet.net> References: <7603e5d805091604561e83e2f2@mail.gmail.com> <200509162307.39783.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20050916135614.GF2813@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1544925.qmPJAtRVJK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 16 September 2005 23:26, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Yep, I think this probably takes care of step 1 and possibly 3b, although > the message that Wouter gets is making me think that for some reason > the port has *not* run brandelf on the executables - if brandelf had been > run, wouldn't the error message mention ELF binary type 3, not 0? > > So I went ahead and included all the steps, just to cover all bases :) I'd be *very* suprised.. I expect he just downloaded an RPM from somewhere.. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1544925.qmPJAtRVJK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDKs/V5ZPcIHs/zowRArnpAJ9riyVJtwJPLmlb2kYJgl4+T2ck1gCgpeTg WkwGgNSBWAzTZ+JTzybXYjg= =XnY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1544925.qmPJAtRVJK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200509162329.49465.doconnor>