Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:45:34 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Threading/KSE problem Message-ID: <200509211645.36060.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0509201446510.9634-100000@sea.ntplx.net> References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0509201446510.9634-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 02:55 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I don't think anyone thinks that. But I prefer the old way. If we're > not properly keeping track of our ABI changes and what they affect, > then let's work on that problem. Symbol versioning isn't going to > solve that for us anyways. Yes, symbol versioning requires the same level of discipline as the more constrained library version number bumping. If we have decided that our developers are too incompetent to properly bump library versions for ABI changes then they are also too incompetent to handle symbol versioning. Furthermore, even with the massive library bumps, we have still stuck our collective heads in the sand and ignored all the port library version numbers. In theory they should all be bumped for 5 -> 6 as well. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200509211645.36060.jhb>