Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:43:06 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new port for zapping no interest ? Message-ID: <20050927144306.381cf731@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <ed7b1c610509270343199a6d58@mail.gmail.com> References: <ed7b1c610509270343199a6d58@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:43:40 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've first send my new port (first I've made) in this ml, then follow > the instruction given to me (thanks to all) and sent a PR, but no one > seems to have a look to it : > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=86401 > Perhaps I've made a mistake (sent by the web interface to send-pr) as > my sendmail isn't configured. > It's now 6 days I've sent it... > The ports is functionnal as I use it every day for a week now. > > Is it the "normal" behaviour, a wait time for the ports acceptance or > did I forgot something ? First all all, thanks for your work. Ideally a PR with a new port should pass all tests, so the commiter doesn't have to do much work beside testing and the actual commit. The usual wait time for a new port is about 2 weeks, but this can vary; we have only so many commiters and they have a lot of work to do; the best shape the new port is the greater the chances to be committed faster. Your ports has a 3 big problems: no $FreeBSD$ tag for cvs, the PORTVERSION is illegal and has no MAINTAINER. For this to reasons the port can't be committed. I will send you a patch for the things I see wrong in an hour. You should reply to your PR with the corrected version of the port. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050927144306.381cf731>