Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:13:18 +0200 From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> To: AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NB Acer [3|5]0x and ACPI Message-ID: <20050930121318.GA19681@poupinou.org> In-Reply-To: <200509271840.00839.asstec@matik.com.br> References: <20050925080324.27714.qmail@web32809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200509270802.52828.asstec@matik.com.br> <20050927145216.GB26697@poupinou.org> <200509271840.00839.asstec@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:40:00PM -0300, AT Matik wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 11:52, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:02:52AM -0300, AT Matik wrote: > > > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 06:45, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > > > > Well, I'm lost. Could you provide (again) a sysctl hw.acpi both on AC > > > > and on battery, without the debug.acpi.disabled="cmbat"? Also a dmesg > > > > with boot -v if possible. > > > > > > good news > your patch does works and I see the supposed correct values in klaptopdaemon > > but, only with > > economy_cx_lowest="HIGH" > economy_cpu_freq="NONE" > I bought yesterday an Acer laptop, probably similar to yours. I have the same issue with the economy_cx_lowest setting under FreeBSD 6.0-BETA5. I also can confirm I don't have that issue under 5.4. I will look more deeply what cause this regression. Cheers, -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050930121318.GA19681>