Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:24:58 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, le@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum, 5.x performance, ... (was: Re: ANNOUNCE: GNOME 2.12.1 has been merged into the ports tree) Message-ID: <20051107122458.27a1f9e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20051107111800.e199ndcxa8s0c444@netchild.homeip.net> References: <20051106.131413.122956532.yasu@utahime.org> <1131176568.3960.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20051106.131413.122956532.yasu@utahime.org> <op.szszvnn89aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <ZhqaDxv9wJ@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <20051107111800.e199ndcxa8s0c444@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:18:00 +0100 Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote: > > - and performaces is a nightmare on atapi harddisks > > AFAIR 4.x enables the write cache (bad if there's a power failure in > the soft-updates case, since without native command queueing the > drivers may reorder writes witout the possibility to notify > soft-updates about it), So on NCQ disks write_caching should be safe from consistency point-of-view ? -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051107122458.27a1f9e7>