Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:04:37 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SHA256 checksums Message-ID: <20051109170437.GW28443@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <20051109165951.GA75924@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <20051109165951.GA75924@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5FFaGRZUwcpbKFrw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:59:51PM +0200, Vasil Dimov wrote: > Should maintainers explicitly submit PRs with the SHA256 checksums... > seems quite tedious. Quite so. >=20 > Is there going to be some automatic and massive SHA256 checksum > gather and commit stuff? This is what happened when SIZE was added to distinfo. Most maintainers and committers added the SIZE to their ports, but after some time someone stepped up and did an automated commit to add SIZE to all those ports that did not yet have it added. >=20 > Is "do nothing" the appropriate thing to do in this case (from > maintainer's point of view)? >=20 If you want, you can submit one big PR with the diffs for all your ports at once, but I'm hoping that again someone will step up and do an automated commit in some way or another. -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed while sending this message. --5FFaGRZUwcpbKFrw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDciwlqy9aWxUlaZARAtgwAKDLApGz44QQPML9wmHTDWT8ckwnJQCcDyAN QneVJGQKMf9ooI1iF7axnME= =aBIw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5FFaGRZUwcpbKFrw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051109170437.GW28443>