Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:25:20 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Alejandro Pulver <alejandro@varnet.biz> Subject: Re: bsd.wx.mk Message-ID: <20051121212519.GA7444@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051121232023.5ed476db@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20051121163721.60580f01@phobos.mars.bsd> <20051121211004.GA15250@soaustin.net> <20051121232023.5ed476db@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:20:23PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:10:04 -0600 > linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) wrote: >=20 > > > .warning "FreeBSD versions prior to 5.x do not support Unicode" > >=20 > > Some of them don't support .warning, either :-) > >=20 > > Other than that it looks pretty good. My only concern is with a few > > short variable names (_UC) that might conflict with names used in > > ports themselves? Perhaps I'm just being paranoid. >=20 > Or perhaps we need something like KNOBS with reserved words ? That would be too complicated. System components like bsd.*.mk should just stay away from simple variable names that might be used elsewhere. Kris --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDgjs/Wry0BWjoQKURAkJUAKCFp3i3T5FpJdYEiqskPDvGFdqP1QCg4Npt NiDFe9UQefEdiwiefW1x1+o= =E1Nb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051121212519.GA7444>