Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:59:31 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: so much clock interrupts?! Message-ID: <20051124195930.GA19106@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051124140503.A75939@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051124023928.GA13075@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051124140503.A75939@chylonia.3miasto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:05:16PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> 540 534 99 pdwak 2000= =20 > >> cpu0: > >> time > >> 16825 pdpgs 2000= =20 > >> cpu1: > >> time > >> > >> > >>on FreeBSD 5.3 live CD i have 100 not 2000 times per second > >> > >>isn't it too much?! > > > >No, it's just a consequence of HZ=3D1000 instead of HZ=3D100. I've >=20 >=20 > so why 2000 not 1000? >=20 > 2000 on each processor! Technical reasons..anyway, 2000 might look like a large number to you, but it's really not unless you're on a very slow machine (like a 486). Kris --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhhuiWry0BWjoQKURAiUMAJ0ZrsFGY8pFcrwbce8Xjk+nD0fEhACgtxLs KiqLdcaAkQS89SXVrPWdZH8= =SQLB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051124195930.GA19106>